|
PEOPLEMATH
- THE WAY WE HANG
-
3/8/2000,
4:18am
I love conversations. I crave more of them. And I want these interactions to be
SUBLIME in some way. These moments are transcendent to me.
It's like two different colors of paint blending into one.
Completion is an interesting thing, because it's never really
finished; it's almost like whe have these stages of evolution
along which we pass, and we are changed before and after
these
moments of interpersonal SHAZAM! So here I type, trying to
work the caffeine out of my plasma, and it comes to me that
it is up to me and me alone to create a community
which factors were somehow
"spiritually"
thrust upon us, and what was ENGINEERED. You got questions?
-
-
-
-
What
do you mean when you say that a moment can be engineered?
-
-
I mean that it came about as a result of direct and willful
action on the behalf of one or both parties. We meet,
we talk on the phone, we make plans and we meet again - all
in pursuit of that transcendent moment of interpersonal SUBLIMATION,
when we're communicating
so hardcore that we forget all else but the other; we are
lost in each other's souls at these moments, totally caught
up in the rapture of SUDDENLY NOT BEING ALONE AT ALL.
Music makes these moments happen; seeing a great movie with
a packed house makes this happen; from time to time, the Web
has accomplished this in my life as well. To me, these moments
are Everything That Is Good with a capital G; if they can
be engineered, might it not be imaginable to reverse-engineer
the steps towards these moments so that they might take place
more often and more dependably? Might it not possible for
a WEBSITE to enable these conversations to take place?
-
-
Yes,
of course, but how does this relate to the Unamerican vision?
-
-
This
conversation-oriented attitude will inform this People section
as it develops. To me, people ARE the Revolution. This
entire site exists to train revolutionaries; you do this by
examining the characteristics of revolutionaries and offering
these characteristics up as an education by those interested
in learning the
art of revolution. The People section, therefore, must
necessarily address the single most pressing concern of any
revolutionary - how to build a movement out of a collection
of individuals. To do this, groups must be encouraged
and set free to make autonomous decisions; skills must be
built to teach individuals to network their ideas, will, and
abilities; and a cause must be outlined to give direction
and focus to the group. Have you seen the movie Fight Club
or read the book The
Moon Is A Harsh Mistress? Both detail plans on creating
a revolutionary underground through encouraging the creation
of autonomous collectives to implement a planned mode of attack
on a society. These are the kinds of movements that grow to
impact a society (though the former's emphasis on violence
to wreak that change is sorta Hollywood). The battleground
is nothing less than the national media and ultimately the
government itself.
-
-
So
then, what is your specific goal with hosting a People section?
-
-
Unamerican
is an attempt by one person and his friends to create a revolution.
In my opinion, a revolution looks a whole hell of a lot bigger
than me standing on a corner handing out "fuck work"
stickers; but a thousand kids, all handing out the same brochure
in fifty cities at the same time, and then putting out a press
release about it - WOW!!! You see, direct action rarely
emerges from an AOL chatroom. Group direct action - its
visualization, preparation, and execution - is a dangerous
(and sometimes illegal) game. Simply put, focusing on action
is nearly impossible for strangers whose only common denominator
is the urge to spend some leisure time on chat; it's so easy
as to be trivial to a group of tight friends. Therefore,
out of this section must emerge new groups of tight friends
ready to engage in direct action. I think that engineering
a community designed to make friends out of its visitors is
a really cool goal for this section. and I believe that just
the fact that the people in this community are Unamerican-minded
ought to put a revolutionary spin on whatever actions come
out of it (although that's up to you)
-
-
-
You
make it sound easy!
-
-
Well,
I've got a theory on how to attack the task of forming and
visualizing this groups. Here it is in basic, the core PEOPLEMATH
doctrine: Combinations
of people are like combinations of atoms; some are stable
and some fall apart immediately or decay with time. This
chemical/mathematical metaphor implies that people somehow
ADD UP in various combinations - and occasionally subtract
from, multiply and divide each other. Add a person to an existing
combination, and she or he may reinforce the existing bonds
or dissipate the entire combination. I'm trying to work out
a way to maximize the stability and intelligence of the "molecules"
that are born on this page; think of me as a farmer trying
to keep his crops in sync with the seasons and each other.
I have some theories on what
can galvanize connections between groups, and over time
you'll be seeing some of those theories fleshed out here and
amplified if they work. You see, organizing and motivating
a small group - three to twenty is the average group size
- it's a skill as well as a talent, and through this
section I'm hoping that you people will figure this skill
out and steer your "molecule" towards some serious
chemical reactions; first interpersonally, and then inevitably
towards other groups and finally the outside world (to be
accomplished either in carefully plotted stages, or in a blast
of energy; that's entirely up to you).
-
-
-
In
what way is just meeting people "revolutionary"?
-
-
One
must remember that I define "revolution" somewhat
differently than you might. I think a revolution happens EVERY
time people meet and benefit from that meeting, no matter
what actually transpires. Even if the only result of an exchange
is the further development of an idea, it's totally valid
and can ultimately result in greater action as the idea develops
in people's collective minds. I believe that simply interacting
on a level unknown previously constitutes a revolution. Yes,
that means that I believe that the Internet is revolutionary;
but I believe that this People section (along with groundbreaking
work done by The
Fray and others) is going to push our idea of social interaction,
and ultimately social movements, to a whole new level. And
I betcha, given enough time to develop fully, this section
is going to be a potent laboratory for the conceptualization
of gradual social change accelerated by intentionally-willed
group direct action. By using the attention-economies
of scale that the mass media and the Internet provide us,
we merely have to create local legends that "get out"
and give people revolutionary ideas, rather than worrying
about what the National Guard is going to do. Small groups
are ALWAYS faster than the authorities, and the Internet gives
us the tight and (eventually) secure communications that are
critical to a subversive movement's success.
-
-
So,
what's this movement all about then?
-
-
That's
the part of it that I don't know (well, white lie;
I know some of it). I want the groups themselves to decide
what they're going to do - that's the "autonomous"
bit. I want the groups to be regionally congruent, but strategically
diverse; where one member of the group might be a designer,
another may be the kind of person who is willing to scale
a billboard. The two of them put together are greater than
they are individually as far as their ability to perform revolutionary
actions is concerned. Unamerican Activiites means to be
a forum by which people can search for others to round out
their autonomous groups; while there are thousands of similar
projects on the Internet, none that I know of will be so tightly
focused on generating hundreds of instances of direct action.
While the individual instances of these actions might be quite
small (as simple as developing a group page on Unamerican.com,
or a set of flyers to post around a high school), I am certain
that they will add up to something that can really pack a
wallop against the System. Look, capitalists have the group-coordination
thing down to a science; they use programs like Microsoft
Project to coordinate vast projects involving hundreds of
people and millions in budget on tight timelines. If this
sounds square to you, think of what a revolutionary underground
could DO with such abilities!!!
|